The Incumbent in the Living Room: The Rise of Television and the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections
نویسنده
چکیده
This study shows that the growth of television contributed to the rise in the incumbency advantage in U.S. House elections during the 1960s. Incumbents received positive coverage throughout their term and were generally more newsworthy and better funded than their challengers during the campaign. Less-educated voters, for whom television presented a new, less demanding source of news, were most affected by local television. Analysis of National Elections Studies data reveals that less-educated respondents were more knowledgeable about the incumbent and more likely to vote for the incumbent in districts with television stations. Aggregate analysis shows that incumbents’ vote margins increased in proportion to the number of television stations in their districts.
منابع مشابه
Television and the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections
We use the structure of media markets within states and across state boundaries to study the relationship between television and electoral competition. Specifically, we compare incumbent vote margins in media markets where the content originates in the same state as the media consumers versus those where the content originates out-of-state. This contrast provides a clear test of whether televis...
متن کاملDetecting Manipulation in U.s. House Elections
A fundamental tenent of representative democracy is that votes should be counted in a fair and unbiased manner. Contrary to this premise I nd that in U.S. House elections this is not the case. I employ a novel approach to detect electoral manipulation by looking at extremely close elections where the outcome between any two candidates should be random. I nd that in extremely close elections t...
متن کاملParty and Incumbency Cues in Voting: Are They Substitutes?1
A possible explanation for the rise of the incumbency advantage in U.S. elections asserts that party and incumbency are close informational substitutes. A common claim in the literature is that as the salience of partisan cues decreased, voters attached themselves to the next available piece of information – incumbency. Minnesota state legislative elections provides a unique setting for testing...
متن کاملVoting for Parties or for Candidates: Do Electoral Institutions Make a Difference?
Little is known about how electoral institutions systematically affect the level of incumbency advantage in legislative elections. In this paper, I analyze the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) data to put the U.S. case in a comparative context and explore how electoral institutions aid or preclude incumbents from gaining an advantage. In particular, I study whether electoral system...
متن کاملVoting Cues and the Incumbency Advantage: a Critical Test1
A possible explanation for the rise of the incumbency advantage in U.S. elections asserts that party and incumbency are close informational substitutes. With the declining psychological importance of party, voters attached themselves to the next available piece of information { incumbency. A critical test of this idea arises in the peculiar circumstances of Minnesota state legislative elections...
متن کامل